top of page

How Many Exercises Do We Really Need? - Jake Langham

  • May 11
  • 2 min read

Scroll through social media for five minutes and you’ll probably see more exercises and circus tricks than anyone could reasonably sift through in a lifetime.

New variations. New combinations. New “must-try” movements.

And while variety can absolutely have its place, I think a lot of people can stray into believing they need to constantly change exercises to make training effective.

In reality, most people probably don’t need more exercises. They need more exposure to the right ones for their goals.

A good exercise doesn’t suddenly stop working after two weeks.

In fact, for many people, the first few weeks are simply the learning phase. You’re figuring out positioning, balance, tension, breathing, timing and coordination. Only after that do you really start expressing force and progressing properly.

Take something like a split squat.

At first it can feel awkward and unstable. Balance is inconsistent, the legs fatigue quickly and it’s hard to find rhythm. But after repeated exposure, most people move better, feel more stable, produce more force and gain confidence under load.

The exercise didn’t magically become better. The athlete simply became more efficient at performing it.

That’s one of the biggest benefits of repetition in training:it allows measurable progression.

If exercises change every session, it becomes difficult to track:

  • technique

  • output

  • load progression

  • work capacity

  • movement quality

Training can slowly drift from development into entertainment.

This doesn’t mean variation is bad.

Different exercises can help manage fatigue, reduce overuse, expose weak links and keep training enjoyable. Variation can be incredibly useful when applied with purpose.

But there’s a difference between purposeful variation and constant randomness.

A lot of people abandon exercises right before they would have actually become good at them.

The reality is that most successful training programs are built around repeated exposure to foundational movement patterns:

  • squatting

  • hinging

  • pushing

  • pulling

  • carrying

  • locomotion

The tools may change slightly over time, but the principles rarely do.

Simple training isn’t inferior training.In many cases, it’s the reason progress happens at all.

Sometimes the most effective thing you can do is stop searching for a completely new program and spend more time improving your execution, consistency and output within the one you already have.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page